Site Loader

Vladimir Jabotinsky: The Iron Wall – We and the Arabs (). It was inevitable that Jabotinsky would attract the attention of the leaders of the WZO. His journalism gave him tremendous mobility. In he. In Jabotinsky was elected to the Zionist Executive. . This, in a nutshell, was Jabotinsky’s policy regarding the Arab question: to erect an iron wall of Jewish.

Author: Jukree Maulmaran
Country: Costa Rica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 12 July 2007
Pages: 368
PDF File Size: 17.92 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.92 Mb
ISBN: 423-6-19845-226-9
Downloads: 29428
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kajigrel

Ariel Sharon, buoyed by public support for the move, quit the Likud and set up his own party – “Kadima”, which in Hebrew means “Forward”.

Texts Concerning Zionism: “The Iron Wall”

From a moral standpoint, he said, Zionism was either a positive or a negative phenomenon, and anyone who had become a Zionist had necessarily concluded that Zionism was positive, a moral movement with justice on its side.

Palestine in could not provide him with a livelihood as a litterateur, certainly nothing jzbotinsky would satisfy his wife Anna, and he had no choice but 10 return to Constanlinople. Throughout his five years in power, Sharon adamantly refused to resume the negotiations on the final status of the territories until the Palestinian Authority PA delivered a complete end to the jabotinwky.

Every native population, civilised or not, regards its lands as its national home, of which it wapl the sole master, and it wants to retain that mastery always; it will refuse to admit not only new masters but, even new partners or collaborators. Rion was to be followed by a second stage: On the contrary, it is a recipe for never-ending strife, violence, and bloodshed.

Any native people β€” its all the same whether they are civilized or savage β€” views their country as their national home, of which they will always be the complete masters.


Why Jabotinsky Still Matters

Sharon, however, made no distinction between the democratically elected Palestinian Authority and the militant organizations of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, lumping them all together as terrorists. Instead, the only option he presented to his security cabinet was the plan jabotibsky by the IDF, then at the peak of its influence. I am proud to have been a member of that group which formulated the Helsingfors Program.

And when that happens, I am convinced that we Jews will be found ready to give them satisfactory guarantees, so that both peoples can live together in peace, like good neighbours. Empty rhetoric of this kind is dangerous. We cannot qall support Arab movement, it is at present hostile to us and consequently we all, including even the pro-Arab rhetoriomongers, rejoice at every defeat sustained by this movement, not only adjacent Transjordan, and Syria, but even in Morocco.

It separates children from their schools, farmers from their land, and whole villages from their medical facilities. His articles impressed the Russian Zionist leaders.

The Iron Wall Revisited | The Institute for Palestine Studies

Also by Avi Shlaim in openDemocracy: Make a tax-deductible donation today! The attitude of the Arabs was clear, he wrote. Democracy and self-determination are sacred principles, but sacred principles like the Name of the Lord must not be used in vain β€”to bolster up a swindle, to conceal injustice. Rabin was succeeded as prime minister by Shimon Peres, one of the principal architects of the Oslo Accord.

But the native resisted both barbarian and civilized settler with the same degree of cruelty. Both knew that the desired goal igon be achieved only by force.

The Jewish State and Jewish Problem. But he would hardly release the prisoners in advance, as Nazarbek desired. Jabotinsky regarded Jewish military power as the key factor in the struggle for a state and he never wavered in this conviction. This Arab jaboitnsky was actually willing to agree that Palestine has a very large potential absorptive capacity, meaning that there is room for a great many Jews in the country without displacing a single Arab.


Such a proclamation can only harm us. Both were disciples of Jabotinsky; both were dedicated to the Greater Israel project; both were suspicious of outside powers. So that all those who regard such an agreement as a condition sine qua non for Zionism may as well say “non” and withdraw from Zionism. Furthermore, how the settler acted had no effect whatsoever. Gradually, Labor Zionists came round to his point of view without openly admitting it.

The al-Aqsa intifada had been raging since 28 Septemberand new Israeli elections had been called. We must either suspend our settlement efforts or continue them without paying attention to the mood of the natives.

Socialism for him was more a rhetorical resource for legitimizing the building of a Jewish state than a blueprint for a just society. The iron wall is merely a metaphor. The contest is an unequal one between a vulnerable Palestinian David on jahotinsky one hand and a heavily armed and heavy-handed Israeli Goliath on the other.

Address at the First Zionist Congress. In other words, for us the only path to an agreement in the future is an absolute refusal of any attempts at an agreement now.