INTRODUCCION A LA HISTORIA CONTEMPORANEA by GEOFFREY BARRACLOUGH and a great selection of similar Used, New and Collectible Books. Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea (English, Spanish, Paperback) / Author : Geoffrey Barraclough ; ; History, Books. : Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea (Spanish Edition) ( ) by Geoffrey Barraclough and a great selection of similar New.
|Published (Last):||27 February 2010|
|PDF File Size:||6.18 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Luana Fortes Miranda rated it really liked it Jun 19, conte,poranea The world he knew from his study of the past bore little relation to the world he encountered in the contemporaanea Both contributed, with increasing force as time passed, to the decline of the certitutdes which had sustained the commonly accepted picture of man and the universe.
Sam Fickling rated it it was amazing Dec 15, Secondly, in the first and later chapters goeffrey examines at some length the connection between independence, democracy, and freedom. The crisis of confidence he experienced, then, was in the authority and purpose of history. Western statesmen, exhausted by the diplomatic and political exertion to obtain German rearmament, failed to respond constructively to Soviet concessions which sug- gested a desire for detente.
He charged that liberalism was a spent force and agreed with Toynbee that western Europe had lost its vitality, arousing the ire of critics like Pieter Geyl, who accusd him bafraclough defeatism. The audience for history was no longer local and general, but global and specialized.
Results for Geoffrey-Barraclough | Book Depository
They would see, in looking back, a mnflict be- tween two conceptions of right, not between right and wmng much like those historians today who examine the thirteenth-century conflict between the ‘”terrorist” William Tell and the house of Habsburg. He found that the tenets of historicism were ill-adapted to his needs, while at the 22 Ibid. Home Contact Us Help Free delivery worldwide.
The effect of [universal franchise], stated shortly, was to make unworkable the old system of parliamentary democracy that had developed in Europe out of the “estates” of late medieval and early modern times, and to inaugurate a series of structural innovations which resulted in a short space of time in the displacement of the liberal, individualist representative system by a new form of democracy: And with regards to communism, points out how they themselves were, in the majority, a very sedate group of intellectuals in comparison with the wave of terrorism that shocked the precarious political establishment.
He had acquired considerable knowledge of the papal chancery and of Hohenstaufens, I-Iohenzollm, and Habsburgs, while learning little of the Byzantine empire and nothing whatsoever of Piasts, Pmmyslids, and Ruriks.
In this respect the currently popular distinction between liberal and totalitarian democracy is not altogether satisfactory, since [ Barraclough does not outright deny that revolutionary movements generally were the signs of this radically new contemporary age, however he is more likely to stress the aforementioned revolution within parliamentary democracy writ large.
It grown the capacity of any one person to master it. The title- History, Morals, and Politics-was indeed forbidding, and the issue of moral judgment in historiography which he wrestled with that day at Chatham House was a difficult one.
Becoming Historical – Historical Nevertheless there is no doubt that the rise of a new ideology which came after to be identified with Soviet Russia, and the ensuing conflict between the new ideology and the old, profoundly affected the character of contemporary history. Banaclough thought that the concept of a Western tradition might once have been useful as an instrument of historical interpretation, at least in the practised hands of a Ranke, a Giesebrecht, or an Acton, but its utility had been miously compw mised since the war because of its appropriation for political purposes.
Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea by Geoffrey Barraclough
Barradough’sappointment tothestevenson Chair was amajcxtuming point in his canxr. Contemporary historians must appmch their subject in the same way Tho years earlier, quoting Sir Isaiah Berlin, Barraclough had censured the moral relativism encouraged by historkist injunctions to study the past on its own terms.
In a succession of short, critical pieces he voiced his disMtisfaction with the d v e d version of E m pean history and called for its radical revision in light of postwar cham- stanoes. Westem Europe was neither as unified nor as antithetic to its eastem neighburs as the term suggested.
Paolo Grill rated it it was amazing Mar 11, Its premise was that only “a new framework and new terms of reference” would enable people to understand the “forces at play in the contemporary world and the stntctural changes that underlay them. This suggests that his own wexamhation had come to a head in the interim, as he grappled with the problems of writing mntemporq universal history. These were questions that Barraclough took up in the Stevenson Inaugural Lecture.
Trivia About An Introduction t He is con- cerned here “primarily not with facts but with types of argument” p. The problems they posed of objectivity and moral judgment were not by any means peculiar, in his view, to con- temporary history; they w e only made more immediate by public attituds, pressuws of political expediency and inevitable gaps in the evidence available to the analyst. In the authors’ judgment, the Bandung conference, which signalled the emergence of a third world force, may have been the most significant event of the period under review.
Also intriguing overviews of the descent from peak imperialism at the end of the nineteenth century, into the steady break up of the old European empires.
Ashley Montagu Boston, Sophie Gale rated it really liked it May 03, These, he suggested, were concepts, and prohibition of them in theory meant only that intuition, analogy, metaphor, and mnvention substituted for rigorous methodology and critical reflection in their invention and use.
It is new because the politically active elements today no longer consist of a relatively small body of equals, all economically secure and sharing the same social background, but are drawn from a vast amorphous society, comprising all levels of wealth and education, for the most part fully occupied with the business of earning a daily living, who can be mobilized for political action by the highly integrated political machines we call “parties. Agreement was impossible, he noted, on the question of whether or not the new imperialism of the late nineteenth century was eamomidy geofdrey, but no one could dispute its ecoIlomic amse quences.
Critical Essays and Reviews, ed. The transition from sedate liberalism, with its respect for birth, property and bardaclough, to mass democracy, which was an accomplished fact in the United States bywas a far more hesitant process on the European side of the Atlantic. Availability All In stock 9.
In An Introduction to Contemporary History, published in 1!? Introduccin a la Historia contemporneaby Geoffrey Barraclough Documents. The ultimate refinement – some would say the reductio ad absurdum – was the surrealistic word sequences of James Joyce, Gertrude Stein, and E.
This rejection of moral judgment interlocked with Barrachugh’s rejection of historicism. Format All Paperback Hardback.