Site Loader

In , the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) was introduced into clinical psychiatry because the existing depression rating scales. Estudio de validación de la escala de depresión de Montgomery y Åsberg of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in. Se realizó un análisis factorial de la escala; se determinó la consistencia .. A three-factor model of the MADRS in Major Depressive Disorder.

Author: Yoshura Voodooktilar
Country: Dominica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 10 June 2018
Pages: 385
PDF File Size: 19.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.18 Mb
ISBN: 642-2-23689-412-7
Downloads: 16565
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nerr

Results Both scales indicated good reliability properties; however, the MADRS reliability statistics were higher than those of the HAM-D for detecting initial symptoms of unipolar depression. The impact of this variable on the prevalence of depression has been established in epidemiological studies 44showing that younger people are exposed to a greater risk of madrss disorders such as mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders.

The two detecting methods i.

Nonetheless, reliability results for short versions indicated that that scales has good sensitivity and specifity scores 23 and HAMD was not sensitive to specify depression symptoms as expected 1213 Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro.

Clinical assessment In order to determine the stability of the condition at baseline visit, all patients were evaluated with the Modified Clinical Global Impression Scale for Bipolar Disorder CGI-BPM 23,24 ; the madrd Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HDRS 27,28 was also administered to record and score any present depressive symptoms and their severity at the time patients were included in the study. How accurate are patients in reporting their antidepressant treatment history? It is known that bipolar I patients are often initially diagnosed as unipolar because they tend to seek medical assistance during the depressive phase [ 4 ].

The study was conducted in 88 Spanish centers which enrolled a sample of consecutive outpatients attending Community-based Mental Health Services and private clinics. Ricardo Madrrs Moreno, Email: The first study with the HAM-D was conducted in the s.

Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale – Wikipedia

This study allows that the use of a shorter version of HAMD might be an adequate possibility, and also that depressive symptoms were similar among groups. The responsiveness of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Concerning the MADRS, reliability was also as expected, showing scores in agreement with those found in other studies [ 91021 ].


Quantitative rating of depressive states. Abstract Since the introduction of antidepressants to psychopharmacology in the s, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAM-D has been the most frequently used rating scale for depression.

The low recurrence rate in the Sin-Depres study could be explained in addition to a short follow-up period, by some other factors which could have contributed to our negative result, like the easy access to health care by the Spanish public health care system and the fact that all the patients escsla treated and prospectively followed up. An international study of the relation between somatic symptoms and depression.

Finally, the pitfall of using unauthorized scale versions has been discussed with reference to self-rating depression scales.

As such, fluctuations in the depressive components result in variations of the socio-occupational functioning and social adjustment. Services on Demand Journal. Some studies reveal correlation coefficients between 0. Test-retest methodology was employed using a two-day interval between interviews. American Educational Research Association.

Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale

Subclinical symptoms and social-occupational performance The relationship between depressive symptoms and social-occupational performance, showing an expected inverse relationship, was confirmed in our study. Subsyndromal depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder during clinical remission.

Macroanalysis focuses on the diagnosis of depression and thereby the prediction of treatment response, while microanalysis focuses on outcome measures of treatment. Second point is that there are limitations about the sample size.

The relationship among numbers is represented mwdrs simple additive effect, regardless of reciprocal interaction. Ovidio Pires de Campos St. It is also pertinent to highlight some of the observed qualitative differences in depressive and bipolar I symptomology, even those that were not statistically significant.

For example, they may not think it relevant eg, feelings of guiltthey may be embarrassed eg, loss of libido or they may be too polite to mention to the interviewer that they believe they are suffering from a physical maxrs With the introduction of DSM-III and DSM-IV, the subdivision of depression into endogenous and reactive depression was deleted, and research on the Newcastle scales, which had been based on this concept, became very limited. A non parametric approach was considered for the analysis of parameters based on time estimations, or for those measurements with a non-normal distribution.


A study comparing the 17 and 6 item version of HAMD indicated kadrs the six-item scale has a strongly relationship with 17 items in baseline and at endpoint of MDD patients double and melancholic depression in four antidepressant drug treatment trial. Retrieved from ” https: A secondary aim was to compare responses between the unipolar and bipolar I group.

escapa M Ruiz-Aguado have not conflicts of interest. The HAM-D is a hetero-rated scale: Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. According to Emmelkamp, 2 the microanalysis of a depression rating scale is mainly focused on the clinimetric analysis of outcome measurements of treatment. There are many reasons why patients may escaka mention a symptom at an interview. It should also be considered that the correlation magnitudes seem to show a tendency to increase during the applications.

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Psychiatry Institute, Mood Disorders Unit. Guidelines for the treatment of unipolar depressive disorders.

Rating scales in depression: limitations and pitfalls

A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. The overall score ranges from 0 to Grade scores of the Montgomery-Asberg depression and the clinical anxiety scales. Considering these results, the MADRS items appear to be more appropriate for assessing unipolar depression, in view that discriminated more significant differences between bipolar and unipolar patients.

Esvala is a cross-sectional, prospective, week epidemiological study of a cohort of outpatients with clinically stable bipolar disorder.

Consequently, this heterogeneity has serious limitations escaa the predictive validity of the diagnosis concerning choice of treatment.

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of fluoxetine versus placebo and tricyclic antidepressants in the short-term treatment of major depression. Montgomery SA, Asberg M.