Explaining the Brain. Carl F. Craver. Abstract. What distinguishes good explanations in neuroscience from bad? This book constructs and defends standards for. Carl Craver’s recent book offers an account of the explanatory and Review of explaining the brain: mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Carl Craver’s Explaining the Brain admirably fills that gap. The science, according to Craver, consists in telling ever more detailed stories.
|Published (Last):||13 September 2018|
|PDF File Size:||14.70 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Bibliographic Information Print publication date: Jacqueline Anne Sullivan – – Synthese 3: The Method of Levels of Abstraction. This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online – view abstracts and keywords at book and chapter level.
Carl F. Craver, Explaining the Brain – PhilPapers
Readers in neuroscience, psychology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science will find much to provoke and stimulate them in this book. Mechanism as a Working Hypothesis 3. Integrating Crsver and Neuroscience: Craver – – Philosophy of Science Supplemental Volume 69 3: Causal Relevance and Making a Difference 3.
Dennis Patterson – – Neuroethics 4 3: It will be explaiining indeed to surpass this work in the near future. Neuroethics, Misc in Applied Ethics.
Explaining the Brain – Paperback – Carl F. Craver – Oxford University Press
Being Realistic about Reasons T. Interlevel Experiments and Constitutive Relevance 8.
Refresh and try bbrain. Review of Explaining the Brain: Zina rated it really liked it Mar 26, Carl Craver’s book Explaining the Brain: Raymond rated it it was amazing Jan 01, Readers in neuroscience, psychology, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of science will find much to provoke and stimulate them in this book.
In developing this approach, he draws on a wide range of examples in the history of neuroscience e.
Reconstructing Reality Margaret Morrison. Rachel Williams rated it really liked it Feb 24, This is tro Disappointing in its treatment of “fundamentalist” accounts of causation. Causation as Transmission 3. Jm rated it liked it Oct 04, Govert Schuller rated esplaining really liked it Aug 05, Craver constructs and defends standards for evaluating neuroscientific explanations that are grounded in a systematic view of what neuroscientific explanations are: The Spiritual Automaton Eugene Marshall.
The Norms of Mechanistic Explanation 1. Starting With Neuroscience 2.
Explaining the Brain
Manipulation and Criteria for Explanation 5. Starting With Neuroscience 1.
A Field-Guide to Levels 3. Aug 02, Anibal added it. Being Realistic about Reasons T.